Saturday, November 12

The Princess and the Frog: Simple Present

This is one of the best animated movies by Disney in recent years. It is fun, amusing and uplifting. The music and plot are great. I love it. I used this scene to practice the simple present tense based on a typical routine day in New Orleans. In the end, the students may personalize the exercise talking about themselves and their own city. They loved it!







A. Take a look at the activities below. Watch the movie segment and write T if Tiana, the main character, performs the activity or P if it is the people of New Orleans who do it, or B if both Tiana and the people do it on a typical day, according to the segment.




( ) 1. Read a magazine on the way to work.

( ) 2. Play musical instruments in the streets.

( ) 3. Dance in the streets of New Orleans.

( ) 4. Serve food and drinks in a restaurant.

( ) 5. Play card tricks.

( ) 6. Buy newspapers in the streets.

( ) 7. Have fun.

( ) 8. Make magic.


B. Now write down four affirmative and four negative statements about what Tiana does (doesn't do) and what people do (don't do) on a typical New Orleans day. Use the information in exercise A.


Affirmative sentences:

1 ...................................................................

2 ..................................................................

3 ..................................................................

4. .................................................................




Negative statements:

1 ..................................................................

2 .................................................................

3 .................................................................

4 .................................................................

C. Now take a look at the activities in exercise A. Write affrimative and negative statements saying wht you do (don't do) on a Brasilia's (or your town's) typical day.


Ex 1. I read (don't read) a magazine on my way to work (school).

2 ....................................................................

3 ....................................................................

4 ....................................................................

5 .....................................................................

6 .....................................................................

7 .....................................................................

8 .....................................................................







WORKSHEET

MOVIE SEGMENT DOWNLOAD - THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG

Film Club: Day For Night

Before Halloween, one of my very best Internet friends, Allison, proposed we watch a horror film we'd never seen and chat about it on our sites. We settled on Les diaboliques, but some snafus led to those plans falling through. But we refined things a bit and regrouped to talk about Day for Night, a film I've been meaning to watch for years (I think I even rented it at one point but ended up sending the disc back unwatched). I'm glad to say Truffaut's film more than lived up to its reputation, and I had a great time chatting with Allison about it, and I think we covered most of the film's terrific charm.

To read our back-and-forth, head over to Allison's site, Nerd Vampire, and check out her post.

Friday, November 11

The Rum Diary (Bruce Robinson, 2011)

Seeing Bruce Robinson attached to The Rum Diary made me want to see the adaptation of Hunter S. Thompson's novel far more than even Johnny Depp's return as the writer's stand-in. The writer-director made the greatest movie yet made about the bleak (and bleakly comic) effects of spiraling alcoholism, Withnail and I, making him theoretically perfect to bring the early days of Thompson to life. However, not five minutes passed before I instantly realized he was precisely the wrong person for this film, and the rest of the film only proved me right.

The Rum Diary, Thompson's fictionalized account of his time in Puerto Rico as a struggling writer, itself embodies a sense of emergence in the author. Imperfect as the book is, it shows Thompson on the cusp of finding himself, precisely through the substances that would later derail him. It is in Thompson's most booze-soaked, tongue-loosened moments that The Rum Diary foretells the man who would win infamy by spilling out his chemically rotted brain with each article. But Robinson's depiction of the cult hero's excess carries a sense of foreboding irony that would make him the perfect choice to survey the writer's late career, not the birth of his inspiration.

Robinson's Diary opens on the bloodshot eye of Thompson's ersatz self Paul Kemp (Johnny Depp) awakening to his first morning in Puerto Rico, where a circling biplane outside his hotel already spoils his view of the natural beach. We've just started and already it feels like the end of the party, and Paul hasn't even figured out how to get into the room fridge yet for the booze! Thompson hasn't even fully discovered drink, much less drugs, and Robinson is already wringing his hands over where it will lead.

Paul stumbles into work at his new gig at the San Juan Star, an English-language paper for the tourists who come to the American territory and never leave the hotel. The real Thompson was so green at the time that he couldn't even work at this place, and it's hard to imagine him doing so even if he could. Robinson doesn't resort to a montage to get the point across, instead letting a single scene of Paul interviewing a brain-dead bowler so rotund he resembles the cartoon humans of Wall•E and his xenophobic wife speak volumes about the insipid capitalist oblivion being sold to these sheltered white people. Outside hotel walls, Puerto Ricans live in extreme poverty, and the paper's editor (Richard Jenkins) dismisses any attempt to write about that hard truth. He says the paper exists to sell the visitors on the idea that they're living the American Dream, a term he uses so insistently and ironically it comes to resemble Milo's mantra of everyone having "a share" in his syndicate in Catch-22.

That open disdain for corrupting capitalism buoys the film, though its human embodiment, Sanderson (Aaron Eckhart), eventually drags down the narrative. On his own, Sanderson is a brilliant caricature, such a sell-out that his senses bypass normal perception for greed. He looks out over a crisp blue ocean and sees only money, planning to insert hotels and marinas that will soon turn those waters to polluted sludge and prevent the actual natives from ever seeing the ocean again, locked as they'll be behind private property fences.

Tied to his girlfriend Chenault (Amber Heard), however, Sanderson's avarice comes to offend Paul for petty reasons of jealousy rather than political disgust. Sanderson is already everything Thompson hates, so to define him primarily by his relationship to Paul's love interest cheapens the character's impact. Furthermore, the chauvinism Sanderson displays toward Chenault is meaningless considering the sexist light in which Thompson cast her, a problem Robinson fails to rectify.

Thompson's formulating political stances thus softened, it falls to his tentative discovery of the more dangerous side of substance abuse to float the film. But, as has already been said, Robinson's direction is simply too sober for what The Rum Diary needs to be. His dimmed, earthen-toned lighting resembles that of a Hopper painting, communicating a sense of loneliness and despair that clashes with the fiery indignation slowly rising in Thompson/Paul's throat like booze he hasn't yet figured how to keep down. It's the same oaken palette as Withnail and I despite showing a far more colorful location and story, transplanting the open-casket-reception tone of the former into an incongruous situation.

The Rum Diary occasionally works, even within its vaguely moralizing aesthetic premise. Giovanni Ribisi is hilarious as the half-decipherable Moberg, whose slurring shuffle and exaggeratedly bum-like appearance works as a makeshift Ghost of Christmas Future for our good Raoul Duke. Depp's impression is coherent here, revealing the presence of brain cells not yet eradicated by a cocaine- and bourbon-fueled genocide, but Ribisi shadows him with promises of mumbles and mood swings to come. To clarify, Robinson does not disserve the film by hinting at the dark road upon which drugs and alcohol will place Thompson. If anything, this film lacks the power of Withnail and I in demonizing hollow, joyless hedonism. That film ripped off crusted scabs while also finding the humor in its hopelessness; this just feels like a demented after-school special. The Rum Diary is a story that openly builds to the optimism of substance use, and Robinson can't square that with his (admittedly more mature) hindsight. It just doesn't work, robbing an already scattershot work of its flashes of power, insight, and groundwork laying.

Thursday, November 10

Beneath the Earth Film Festival

OK gang, so recently I was a judge for the Beneath the Earth Film Festival, which showcased short films by up-and-comers looking to prove their stuff. Of the seven films screened, I particularly enjoyed three and felt another three showed real promise (only one completely irritated me, but it shall remain nameless), and I was happy to have participated. Four of the films won for the various categories, but I'd like to briefly highlight the two big winners for Best Film and Audience Award:

Best Film: Photographs

I was extremely pleased to see this film win, though I can't conceive of how it couldn't. A brief, beautifully animated vignette of an old woman discovering a camera that doesn't seem all that much younger than her, Photographs is superb. Its wordless six minutes doesn't waste a second, yet the film takes its time in revealing the significance of the woman's innocent self-portraits. But even without the heartbreaking finale, Photographs is still a moving testament to the childlike properties that art instills in us and nourishes in even the bleakest, most unforgivingly adult situations.

Audience Award: After Ever After

I confess less enthusiasm for the audience award recipient, even if it's still not my least-favorite of the seven films. After Ever After works as a sort of mashup between the works of Michel Gondry and (500) Days of Summer, only it lacks the innovation and cheek of either. I was also ready to pounce on the occupation of its protagonist, the increasingly stale job of the adman, but reading that the director actually has worked for ad agencies mollified me somewhat. At least he's writing from experience; I feel like Hollywood just acknowledges what it really does when it puts its characters in advertising firms. But even if the film doesn't strike me as original or even remarkable, the aesthetic components are all in place: it displays solid editing, cinematography and direction throughout, which are all the things short films are supposed to hone.

Tuesday, November 8

Harakiri (Masaki Kobayashi, 1962)

As with so many other Japanese directors, Masaki Kobayashi used the jidai-geki genre and its focus upon the past to comment on the present. After his three-part WWII epic The Human Condition, Kobayashi went even further back in time to the beginning of the Edo period, after the Tokugawa shogunate had fully consolidated power and settled in to its two-century reign. The director specifically hones in on this precise moment of dawning peace, when the reduction of daimyo resulted in samurai suddenly becoming masterless ronin in a society that had no need for additional warriors. This reduced much of the nobility to conditions of extreme poverty even as it demanded their continued fealty to the feudal order and codes of honor.

One of those codes was the ritual suicide from which the film takes its title. Harakiri is structured around the build-up to an expected act of seppuku, and it shows a particularly gruesome example of one during that escalation. Even today, we consider dying for one's cause an act of extreme nobility and resolve. For Kobayashi, however, it is merely the most repellent example of how the rules of a strictly hierarchical society efface humanity and suppress the will of the individual. The end result rates with the most biting of Mizoguchi's period pictures as Japanese cultural criticism.

Harakiri begins with Hanshiro Tsugumo (Tatsuya Nakadai) arriving at the palace of the Iyi clan requesting that he be allowed to use their courtyard to commit harakiri. A penniless ronin, Hanshiro looks more ragged than even Toshiro Mifune's ersatz warrior in Seven Samurai; a wiry beard hangs in patches on his face like steel wool glued to his cheeks, and hair skews out behind his wide, seemingly wild eyes. He looks so defeated that his request for one last honor seems genuine, though when Saito, the clan's counselor, sits to speak with him, the film slowly reveals layers of horrific depth that make even the idea of slashing oneself to death seem lighthearted in comparison.

Rentaro Mikuni provides a well-groomed contrast for Nakadai as his Saito speaks—or perhaps it is more accurate to say that he solemnly intones—to Hanshiro. Without betraying any emotion, Saito relates the tale of another masterless samurai of the clan Hanshiro used to serve coming to the Iyi palace with the same request. Flashbacks show that young man, Motome Chijiwa, pleading for the same privilege, but Kobayashi throws off the sense of stoic composure that defined the film to this point (and afterward). Where Hanshiro, despite his unkempt appearance, is gathered and emotionless, Motome betrays unease and anxiety; one look at him and it's clear he does not truly want to kill himself.

Slowly, the pieces fall into place. The Iyi clan meets to discuss Motome's proposal, and one of them reveals that ronin have been showing up at some daimyos' doorsteps asking for permission to kill themselves, only for the lords either give them some money out of pity or to even hire these samurai as retainers. For higher-ups of the Iyi house, however, such charity represents a sign of weakness, and they secretly come up with a sadistic plan to ensure their clan's status in the region.

As the film moves back and forth between the present and this flashback, Kobayashi gradually separates his immaculately composed frames from reason. Kobayashi's camera, previously at eye level and perpendicular to the shoji screens and tatami floors, cants at disoriented angles and zooms with emotional purpose on facial expressions as the world collapses on Motome's desperate scheme. Yet as the camera spins further out of control, the objects within the frame only grow more disciplined. Kobayashi pulls back into a canted high-angle shot of Motome being forced into following through on his bluff, his jittery, terrified body shivering at the center of Iyi samurai sitting like gargoyles around him.

The disciplined posture of those samurai is but one of many dark ironies arranged in the mise-en-scène. Their unfeeling response to a man's fear is the result of conditioning to the samurai code, which they uphold even as they cruelly invert it to punish Motome. The film's slow pace works to its advantage in such scenes, holding out shots to let their dark meanings achieve maximum impact. The clan leaders further hold Motome to samurai code by forcing him to use his own swords for the ceremony. The problem? He long ago sold his real ones for money, replacing them with bamboo props. An already petrified boy pales further when he is reminded that a samurai's swords are his "soul," and he struggles to even pierce his skin with the flimsy fakes, much less perform the cuts necessary.

This horrific scene would make Kobayashi's point about the barbarity of this feudal code of honor even if the film ended here. Ishihama's face is hard to watch as he rams the blunt stick through his gut, the camera swooning so much it resembles a semi decapitated head at the end of a seppuku ceremony, wherein a second slices through all but a slight bit of skin on the neck to leave the head barely attached. Back the present, Kobayashi only pushes in on the faces of Saito and Hanshiro, the former waiting for the latter to blanch, the latter still committed to his desire for death. But now, a hint of something even darker than suicidal urges plays over Nakadai's face.

In a way, Harakiri is one of the first great revenge movies, the piecemeal revelation of Hanshiro's true motives a brilliantly choreographed connecting of plots that evokes double the tension by play out suspenseful scenes and then linking them with deliberation. But as masterful as Harakiri's plotting is, the nature of Hanshiro's connection to both Motome and the callous Iyi warriors who had him killed goes deeper than narrative. Through Hanshiro's skilled manipulation of Saito's patience (amusingly a stand in for testing the audience itself), he exposes the falsity of samurai codes and any other method of robbing the individual of his freedom. As much as Saito, Omodaka, Kawabe and the rest pervert Bushido, even they still believe in it. But as Hanshiro buys time before his own courtyard act by gradually tying together numerous threads, he ultimately uses his acts of revenge to prove how cowardly people truly are when faced with their own disgraces. As such, Hanshiro's vengeance is not merely physical but psychological, challenging an entire mindset with its hollow worthlessness.

Much as Harakiri speaks to Japan's history of dehumanizing hierarchical control—something that not only applies to complicity in an enslaving feudal system but laid the groundwork for WWII atrocities as well—its conclusion captures the dark totality of any major system of social order. Having been shamed and bested by this filthy, dejected ronin, the Iyi clan stands to lose tremendous face. But then Saito steps in, listing all deaths as illnesses and ensuring that the truths revealed in that courtyard die in it. This resembles more the nihilistic political thrillers of post-Nixon Hollywood than postwar jidai-geki. Whatever sense of victory Harakiri has is short-lived, and that's even before one considers that clearly this awful system will live on for centuries. Its only sense of hope lies in the knowledge that the shogunate will collapse far sooner than it thinks, but even then it will only be replaced by another heartless, dehumanizing order.

Hipsters (Valery Todorovsky, 2011)

After three years, Valery Todorovsky's unorthodox musical Hipsters has finally received a proper, non-festival release on these shores. But while it displays flashes of cleverness—a depiction of sex through scrolling over pages of the Kama Sutra, the Moulin Rouge-lite framing of some of the jazzier tunes—Hipsters never truly captures the gravitas that informs its flashy, ostensibly superficial subject matter. One never feels the fear and the sense of constantly being watched that pervaded the Soviet Union, even in the relative calm of the Khrushchev days, robbing the film of its tension long before it spins off into irrelevant subplots. Even when someone gets arrested for no justifiable reason, this Russia just lacks danger.

Check out my full review now at Spectrum Culture.

Sunday, November 6

The Phantom Carriage (Victor Sjöström, 1921)

The Phantom Carriage is such a spellbinding technical achievement it's easy to overlook just how gentle and suggestive it is. Its ghostly apparitions float through a world of beautifully composed frames, striking even without the layered imagery. Victor Sjöström's 1921 opus captures the icy chill of its winter setting, a sense of static, cold air, of frozen death hanging over a village that already feels necrotic and wasting.

Death is, after all, the whole point of The Phantom Carriage. The title refers to the vessel that transports departed souls to the other plain, and the driver is bound to do Death's bidding for a year. As the legend goes, the last person to die before the midnight toll of the new year replaces the old driver. David Holm (Sjöström) heard that story from his friend Georges before the man died, but it's only when he finds himself on the wrong end of a drunken fight on New Year's Eve that he learns just how accurate this tale tale is.

As an actor, Sjöström is naturalistic, his big, silent cinema emotions not exaggerated into expressionistic or melodramatic flourishes. Holm's story is a tragic one, a tale of self-inflicted misery that can only be alleviated by increasingly strong amounts of alcohol. Sjöström wears a look of woe and wrath, a man so broken by his actions that he now hates everything. Forty-two years old at the time, Sjöström's consumptive hacking and grimy countenance give him the look of an even older, more withered man. His relative youth only makes him scarier when it pokes through the tubercular muck, a reminder of the soul buried under all that baggage.

It's easy to see how the film influenced Ingmar Bergman years later. Sjöström's shots are static and theatrically composed, placing emphasis on the actors' faces and the psychological and spiritual despair playing out over them. Holm's booze-soaked fury is contrasted with the fear of his wife Anna, who leaves her husband when his and Georges' drinking gets out of hand, and the piety of the dying Salvation Army member Edit (Astrid Holm), who wishes to help Holm by reuniting him and Anna. Holm's resolute cynicism battles with that show of faith, and for a time it looks as if his spiritual void will win out over her belief in God.

Much as Sjöström entrusts his actors with communicating the film's atmosphere, he also uses action and visual technique to deepen the film. He inserts the carriage and its driver into the frame by way of innovative and intricate double-exposure that predated the easier process of optical printing by a decade. This was back when hand-cranked cameras were still used, necessitating a precise matching of speed to get the second image over the first. But the results are spectacular, the spirits translucent behind and in front of objects. Sjöström also knows how to frame drama, such as the climactic flashback of Anna locks a cruel, tuberculosis-ridden Holm in the kitchen and he viciously breaks down the door with an axe (something Kubrick would take for the hair-raising climax of his own horror film, The Shining). Sjöström's acting and directing brilliantly builds a mood of terror, mounting from mean-spirited petulance to full-on psychotic terror in minutes.

Unlike the bleak, godless psychosexual dramas Bergman drew from Sjöström's work, The Phantom Carriage ends along more conventional, faith-affirming lines. Nevertheless, if this vision of Death ultimately resembles more the joyous finale of A Christmas Carol than the grim hope of The Seventh Seal, Sjöström's film still connotes a haunting sense of doom throughout. You can feel the cold Nordic wind blowing through the frame, and it's tempting to huddle around every candle shown on the screen, regardless of how little warmth it might offer. It's a wonder Sjöström ever got an offer to work in Hollywood with work like this, but it's not hard to see why someone scouting for talent would be drawn to this technically and emotionally complex art.